“Conversation Starters”

Malcolm Gladwell has the unique ability to start conversations with his writing. Many people, including myself, find that alone enough to be considered successful as a writer. Gladwell did the impossible and made social science cool in watercooler chatter. Many people have a distaste for conversations on social or political issues. Gladwell, through his unique writing style has changed that. By analyzing culture and social trends from a unique perspective he has sparked interest and conversation on topics and relationships in society that were largely undetected. Gladwell tackles topics in his book Outliers concerning the birth dates of hockey players and how strongly correlated those dates are with the players chance of being long term successful hockey players and playing professionally. Gladwell analyzed Bill Gate’s rise to fortune through a unique perspective. There is almost a sort of conspiracy style of writing that Gladwell employs which raises suspicion, interest, and ultimately conversation. I have never been interested in hockey but Gladwell uses statistics that seem to prove truly surprising relationships.

Gladwell’s ability to present sticky concepts to the masses is what really sets him apart. The profound ideas behind his writing fuel is popularity and success. This is not to say that Gladwell lacks any sort of writing or stylistic expertise, but rather in addition to his great storytelling ability is the profoundness of his ideas. More than anything Gladwell challenges popular belief and assumptions.

Murray Davis, a sociologist, published a groundbreaking paper in 1971. The paper included 12 ways of challenging conventional wisdom. Many of the points line up with what Gladwell does with his writing. Take for example the relationship between the second point in Davis’ paper and Gladwell’s Outliers. 

2. What Looks Like an Individual Phenomenon is Really a Collective Phenomenon

Another way to challenge assumptions is to show that what we think is caused by individuals is in fact caused by broader societal forces. This is the heart of Outliers. Gladwell argues that we think professional hockey and soccer players make it because of talent and hard work, but it’s really about being born a few months earlier than their peers. We assume that planes crash due to mistakes made by individual pilots, but it’s actually about the cultures in which they were raised. We believe Bill Gates and the Beatles achieved greatness because of their talents, but they had to be in the right place at the right time.

Here’s why everything Malcolm Gladwell writes is so compelling

Advertisements

2 thoughts on ““Conversation Starters”

  1. adlere353 April 22, 2015 / 1:50 am

    I don’t agree with that last part about “What Looks Like an Individual Phenomenon is Really a Collective Phenomenon.” I believe to an extent that environment plays a role in our destinies, but I think the individual is what has the final say. I’m sure there were at least a hundred people in the same environmental place as Bill Gates, but there is only one Bill Gates. Something has to be said on the nature of the individual to rise above others in similar environments.

    Like

  2. Shane O'Donnell April 23, 2015 / 3:20 am

    Though Gladwell does well to present his points using “relevant” data, he does what data scientists call “cherrypicking” evidence. Yes, there is data that points to a certain conclusion, but overall, there is no guarantee that this is how things work.

    As he suggests in Outliers, being born a few months earlier should grant hockey players an advantage over their peers, right?

    Wrong.

    Though the trend stands in Canadian Junior Leagues, by the time the players reach the professional ranks, the trend is actually reversed, and players born later in the year have an advantage over players born earlier in the year.

    That’s the perfect example of cherrypicking; he finds one piece of data, latches on to it, and makes a false conclusion about a population the data doesn’t apply to.

    He’s not a bad writer, but don’t believe anything information contained in that writing.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s